Last year, I decided to do a little checking up on the charities to which I give. Just to be sure they aren't taking my money on a vacation to Aruba, or something. Invariably the CEO salaries are sky-high. I guess I have to put up with CEOs taking my money to Aruba, even at non-profits. Actually there's one exception: the CEO of Doctors Without Borders only rakes in $100,479. Now that, I can live with.
But it's not so easy to tell what's up. I found two charity ratings organizations and compared. One is Charity Navigator which has a number and star rating (4 stars is tops) and the other is American Institute of Philanthropy, which gives A thru F. AIP gives you a list of top-rated charities, but if you want to get the poop on anything other than these, you have to cough up some cash for their ratings book, which I'm just not going to do.
Here's my list of charities, followed by their ratings:
Charity : AIP rating : CharityNavigator rating
- Oxfam : B+ : 52 (3 stars)
- Doctors without Borders : A : 61 (4 stars)
- Amnesty International : "not top rated" : 35 (1 star)
- Disabled American Veterans : not rated (info not provided to AIP) : 69 (4 stars)
- World Wildlife Fund : not top rated : 48 (2 stars)
- NARAL : not rated (info not provided to AIP) : 40 (2 stars)
- Planned Parenthood : A : 68 (4 stars)
- UNCF : A : 55 (3 stars)
- NPR/CPTV (public radio/tv) : not listed : 60 (3 stars)
- Tibet House : not listed : not listed
- NY Times Neediest Cases Fund : not listed : not listed
- Kids with Cameras : not listed : not listed
- CFPA (Connecticut Forest and Park Association ) : not listed : not listed
So one of my problems in all this is - who is watching the watchers? How do I know that AIP and CharityNavigator are doing a good job? Can I really rely on their ratings? Sure I can read all the info about what they say they do... just like I can read all the info about what these charities say they do. Hmm.